The Bombay high Court quashed the order of a Family court in Sholapur where an application filed by a woman seeking compensation for herself and her son was rejected by branding her with the Stigma of ‘Living in Adultery’ without evidence and allowing her ex-husband’s application for seeking cancellation of maintenance. HC sharply criticized the trail courts approach and increased the maintenance amount for the petitioner and her son.
I am a law student who is a pluviophile and loves to sing.
You Might Want To Read:
No Permission Required To Lead Secondary Evidence Before Trial Court Under Evidence Act: Bombay HC
Bombay High Court Terms Competition Commission Order Illegal
IT Returns May Not Reflect True Picture, Court Has To Take Lifestyle Into Account: Bombay HC On Maintenance
Even A Woman Of Easy Virtue Has The Right To Say ‘No’: Bombay High Court