The Supreme Court in Santosh Vs The State Of Maharashtra where the accused was charged for receiving misappropriated foodgrain meant for public distribution, observed that the investigation officer was of the opinion that the accused was not cooperating with the investigation and kept recapitulating that he did not buy the foodgrains. Thus SC mentioned that just because he did not confess, it cannot be said that he was not cooperating with the investigation.
I am a law student who is a pluviophile and loves to sing.
You Might Want To Read:
SC Upholds FIR Against Christian Charitable Trust; Paves Way For CID Investigation
SC Agrees To Look Into CBI Findings On Karti Chidambaram’s Foreign Accounts
Bombay HC Quashes FIR Against Ceramic Artist Vineet Kacker Accused Of Hurting Religious Sentiments
47 Tihar Inmates Allege Human Rights Violation, Delhi HC Orders ‘Fair’ Probe
