In light of the COVID-19 Outbreak, the Supreme Court of India has taken up a case on its own on the conditions of children’s protection homes across India. A division bench comprising of Justices L Nageshwar Rao and Deepak Gupta will hear the case titled as “In Re Contagion Of COVID-19 Virus In Children Protection Homes” tomorrow i.e. 03.04.2020.
The Supreme Court reviewed upon the needs of special schools for children with special needs. While hearing a PIL concerning lack of special educators in the State of UP for teaching children with special needs the SC took notice that children with special needs have to be imparted education not only by special teachers but there has to be special schools
The Supreme Court has decided to hear a plea filed by kids Arjun-Gopal and others tomorrow seeking restoration of its last years decision of prohibiting fire crackers in Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR). The plea has also sought recall of apex court verdict dated September 12 which had temporarily lifted the order of suspending permanent licences for sale of firecrackers
The Madras High Court on hearing a petition challenging the proposal of Indian Oil Corporation Limited to set up a petrol/diesel retail outlet adjacent to a school, proposed that the Government should consider framing regulations restricting the setting up of petrol/diesel Outlets near schools attended by small children as the presence of airborne organic compounds such as Benzene increases
The Madras High Court has established a committee of medical experts to submit a report on the kinds of treatment for the children suffering from Lysosomal Storage Disorder (LSD). The committee is directed to consider opinions of doctors at different institutions in Delhi and submit a report by 23 October and till then the children suffering shall be
Supreme Court dismissed the Centre’s appeal against a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court, which had validly held that children born out of void marriages are legitimate. The Centre had first appealed against the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal and having lost in both, pursued its appeal in the Supreme Court, adding one more instance to the
